"You can't take a trip to Las Vegas or down to the Super Bowl on the taxpayers' dime...."
So said President Barack Obama back on February 10 of this year. His remarks were directed toward the CEOs of companies who made a devil's bargain and accepted the bailout money that was doled out by the Democrats earlier this year.
On a visceral level, Obama's comment initially seems reasonable: How dare a financially strapped company receive the lifeblood of the American taxpayer and then spend it on hotels and parties in Sin City?!
Upon more thoughtful deliberation, there are two problems with this line of thinking.
First, putting aside the fact that this writer does not believe that the taxpayers' money should be used for this sort of thing in the first place, the bottom line is that it has indeed been given to these companies, presumably with the goal of making them financially solvent again. One of the ways that companies stay profitable is to drum up business. This is done in a myriad of ways, to include, yes, wining and dining potential clients and customers in places like Las Vegas. Like it or not, that is how business gets done. To deny this marketing strategy to companies that have accepted federal bailout dollars is to ensure that they will not be competitive in the free market, and they will most likely fall further behind, thus wasting the sweat and toil of the taxpayers.
Second, I thought Obama and the congressional Democrats are trying to stimulate the economy by creating new jobs and saving existing ones. When these companies go to Vegas and spend hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars, who do you think benefits from that spending? The waiters and waitresses; the casino table workers; the event planners; the alcohol and food suppliers; the mechanic who repairs the vehicles of the alcohol and food suppliers; the list is endless.
On today's Drudge, there is linked an article from the Las Vegas Review-Journal that brings up my latter point. In the last 90 days, over 340 events have been cancelled, costing the city an estimated $131.6 million. The article suggests that the mayor of Las Vegas should send Obama the bill for this loss of income.
As misguided as Obama's stimulus plan is, if it is to be forced upon the American taxpayer, perhaps it would be a good idea if our Dear Leader didn't sabotage our economy's attempted recovery by opening the gaffe-prone hole under his nose.
Good Day to You, Sir
4 comments:
Has it not been reported that the Obama's have been throwing big dinner parties and flying to short destinations on Air Force One? Now I know that the President is often "handled", but doesn't "The Buck Stops Here" sign reside somewhere still in the oval office?
I actually did a post ripping Obama for that statement. Great minds think alike.
Either that or I'm the broken clock that's right twice a day!
You call him Dear Leader? Are you trying to compare him to the North Korean dictator, who's only still in power because that Nazi George Bush didn't do what's right and take him out?
Obama is our PRESIDENT, man. You rethuglicans better get used to it!
(How did I do? Am I even close?)
Nice try, Darren, but you were WAY too polite ;)
Post a Comment