I am still amazed at the number of people who look at the United Nations as some sort of peace-loving, benevolent organization. It is nothing of the kind. It is actually a haven that legitimizes rogue regimes like China, Cuba, Iran. For goodness sake, look at some of the member countries of the U.N. Human Rights Commission, now and in the last couple of years: China, Congo, Cuba, Egypt, Libya, Mexico, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Venezuela, Vietnam, Zimbabwe - not exactly bastions of human rights are they? And yet they were or are members of the U.N. Human Rights Commission. Do you really want the United Nations in charge of regulating the Internet?
One more thing to add, and that involves the U.N.'s Universal Declaration of Human Rights. If you begin reading it, it sounds so good, talking about the freedom to do this, and the right to do that. But if you keep reading, you come to the money shot. Here it is:
Article 29.So the U.N. is saying that you can have all the rights and freedoms you want, but if the U.N. doesn't like it, then you get squashed:
(3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
U.N. Official: "Sorry Mr. Chanman, we do not like the content of your blog. Your views and ideas that you publish are contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. We are shutting you down now. Gentlemen, take Mr. Chanman to the car. He won't need the Internet where he is going."
Good Day to You, Sir
No comments:
Post a Comment